UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM SD

Specialized Disclosure Report

QORVO, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed:

Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure

Conflict Minerals Disclosure

In accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Qorvo, Inc. (“Qorvo”) has filed a Conflict Minerals Report as Exhibit 1.01 to this Specialized Disclosure Report on Form SD. Both reports are publicly available on Qorvo’s website at https://ir.qorvo.com/node/5876.

The content of any website referred to in this report is included for general information only and is not incorporated by reference in this report.

The Conflict Minerals Report required by Item 1.01 is filed as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD.

Section 2 – Resource Extraction Issuer Disclosure

Not applicable.

Section 3 – Exhibits

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.

Exhibit 1.01

QORVO, INC.

CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021

INTRODUCTION

Qorvo, Inc. (herein referred to as the “Company”, “Qorvo”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) presents this Conflict Minerals Report (“CMR”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“Reporting Period”), pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Rule 13p-1”). This CMR should be read in conjunction with the definitions contained in the instructions to Form SD and related rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC defines “conflict minerals” as columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, wolframite, gold, and their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin, and tungsten (also referred to as “3TG”).

COMPANY DESCRIPTION

Qorvo (Nasdaq: QRVO) is a global leader in the development and commercialization of technologies and products for wireless, wired and power markets. We have two reportable segments: Mobile Products (“MP”) and Infrastructure and Defense Products (“IDP”). MP is a global supplier of cellular, ultra-wideband 802.15.4z, Wi-Fi and other wireless solutions for a variety of applications, including smartphones, wearables, laptops, tablets and the Internet of Things (“IoT”). IDP is a global supplier of radio frequency (“RF”), system-on-a-chip and power management solutions for a wide range of markets, including cellular and IT infrastructure, automotive, renewable energy, defense and IoT. Our MP segment supplies RF solutions to global consumer product companies, and our IDP segment supplies a more diverse portfolio of products with generally longer life cycles to a broader base of customers and end markets. Visit www.qorvo.com to learn how Qorvo connects the world.

During the Reporting Period, Qorvo completed its acquisition of NextInput, Inc. (“NextInput”), a provider of microelectromechanical system-based sensing products, and United Silicon Carbide, Inc. (“United SiC”), a provider of silicon carbide power products. Conflict mineral due diligence activities for both NextInput and United SiC, each of which were privately held companies, are completely integrated into Qorvo’s responsible minerals program, and included in the CMR subsections below.

OVERVIEW

Qorvo is committed to the responsible sourcing of minerals and strives to conduct activities that respect and support human rights throughout its global supply chain. We have worked extensively for 13 years on the issue of conflict minerals and recognize that collaborative efforts among industry stakeholders are needed to identify and mitigate the potential risks associated with 3TG extraction in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (collectively referred to as the “Covered Countries”). Qorvo is a member of the Responsible Minerals Initiative (“RMI”), where we regularly collaborate with industry peers and other stakeholders to address 3TG related issues and promote responsible mineral sourcing.

Although most of our products contain conflict minerals, Qorvo does not directly source 3TG from mines or “mineral processors” (herein referred to as “smelters and refiners” or “SORs”). Instead, we source components and materials from suppliers, who source their components and materials from sub-tier suppliers. Qorvo is far removed from the mine sites and SORs in its global supply chain, and

1

is therefore considered a “downstream” company, as described by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (“OECD Due Diligence Guidance”). Due to our position in the supply chain, we rely on our suppliers to provide information on the conflict minerals necessary to the functionality and production of Qorvo products, and we collaborate with industry peers and other stakeholders to meet our responsible mineral goals and customer expectations. Suppliers are requested to assist in our Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (“RCOI”) and due diligence efforts, including the identification of the smelters and refiners who process the conflict minerals used in the products supplied to Qorvo.

For the Reporting Period, in accordance with Rule 13p-1, we conducted a good faith RCOI to determine if any of the conflict minerals used in our products originated in the Covered Countries, or from recycled or scrap sources. As a result of this effort, we determined that some of the 3TG used in our products may have originated in the Covered Countries. Therefore, we have exercised due diligence to determine the source of these conflict minerals, as described in this CMR below.

Upon the exercise of our due diligence – which is subject to and limited by our ability to obtain reliable information for the conflict minerals used in our products – we have not identified any occurrence where our 3TG sourcing has directly or indirectly financed or benefited armed groups in the Covered Countries.

REASONABLE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INQUIRY

For the year ended December 31, 2021, Qorvo’s RCOI process began with identifying our “relevant suppliers” and surveying those suppliers with the RMI developed Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”). We identified relevant suppliers based on the unique circumstance of the Company’s operating and reportable segments, taking a risk-based approach to consider: 1) the potential 3TG content in the components and/or materials provided; and 2) revenue for the Reporting Period.

Relevant suppliers were requested to identify the smelters and refiners that processed the 3TG used in their components and/or materials supplied to Qorvo. We evaluated supplier responses for completeness, accuracy, and degree of supply chain risk, and contacted those suppliers whose CMRTs we identified to contain potential risks, and/or incomplete or potentially inaccurate data. We also reviewed the SORs identified by our suppliers against the lists of processing facilities that were validated by a third-party audit program such as the RMI’s Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (“RMAP”), London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) Responsible Gold Program, or the Responsible Jewellery Council (“RJC”) Chain-of-Custody Certification. We obtained country of origin information for the identified SORs from sources including relevant supplier CMRT responses, the RMI’s RCOI report for member companies, and publicly available resources, if we determined such publicly available information to be reliable.

Results of RCOI

Qorvo conducted a 3TG survey of 151 relevant suppliers, including suppliers from the former NextInput and United SiC supply chains, for the Reporting Period.

As of April 22, 2022, the results of our RCOI were as follows:

2

We had one supplier that did not provide a response to our 3TG survey, and one additional supplier that has not yet identified all the SORs supplying 3TG to its supply chain. Due to these limitations in our sourcing data, we were unable to determine the origin of all the conflict minerals used in our products for the Reporting Period. Qorvo’s due diligence with these suppliers is ongoing and we continue to work our escalation process to drive improvements in their responses.

As of April 22, 2022, all SORs that we currently know or have reason to believe may source from the Covered Countries have been validated as conformant to the RMAP.

DUE DILIGENCE DESIGN

Qorvo’s responsible minerals program includes due diligence measures for the use of 3TG in its global supply chain and is designed to conform to OECD Due Diligence Guidance as it relates to our position in the supply chain as a “downstream” company.

DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES PERFORMED

In alignment with the OECD’S five-step framework for risk-based due diligence, Qorvo performed the following activities to exercise due diligence on the source of the 3TG used in our products for the Reporting Period.

(1) Establish Strong Company Management Systems

3

(2) Identify and Assess Risks in the Supply Chain

(3) Design and Implement a Strategy to Respond to Identified Risks

4

(4) Support Independent Third-Party Audits of SOR Due Diligence

(5) Report on Supply Chain Due Diligence

DUE DILIGENCE RESULTS

Inherent Limitation on Due Diligence Measures Taken

The due diligence measures listed above can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the origin of the conflict minerals used in our products. Our due diligence process is based on obtaining accurate 3TG information from our relevant suppliers and those suppliers obtaining similar information from their supply chains to identify the original sources of the 3TG used in our products. As we do not directly purchase from any SORs – nor do the majority of our suppliers – we have very little influence over SOR sourcing. We rely, to a large extent, on the information provided by independent third-party audit programs. Such sources of information may contain incomplete or inaccurate data and may be subject to fraud.

Smelter and Refiner Due Diligence Results

Qorvo has made a reasonable and good faith effort to collect and analyze information on the 3TG smelters and refiners reported by our relevant suppliers for the Reporting Period. As a result, our suppliers identified 246 SORs as potential sources of the 3TG believed to be in Qorvo’s supply chain. We conducted due diligence on these reported facilities, including whether they are actual smelters or refiners (according to the definitions used by the RMI); whether they are currently operational; and whether they are conformant to a third-party audit program such as the RMAP, LBMA or RJC.

Of the 246 potential SORs identified by our suppliers, 6 were subsequently found to be inoperative in 2021, and therefore not eligible for the RMAP. These facilities are not included in this report as “processing facilities” and are not included in the sections below.

5

Processing Facilities (“SORS”) Identified for the Reporting Period

The use of the terms “smelters and refiners” and “processing facilities” throughout this CMR refers to 3TG entities that 1) were reported in a supplier’s CMRT for the Reporting Period; 2) determined to meet the RMI’s definition of a smelter or refiner; and 3) determined to be operational in 2021. In some cases, our suppliers reported facilities that Qorvo believes are no longer operational. These facilities are not included in this report as “processing facilities” and are not included in the data below. However, we continue to conduct due diligence on such entities and work with our relevant suppliers to improve the quality of the 3TG data reported to Qorvo.

Figure 1: RMAP Participation Status of Identified SORs by Reporting Year

For the purposes of this CMR, participation status is defined in the following manner:

Figure 2: RMAP Participation Status* by Metal for the Reporting Period

6

Table 1: Identified SORs with Covered Country Sourcing*

All smelters and refiners believed to source from the Covered Countries are conformant to the RMAP as of April 22, 2022.

Table 2: List of Identified SORs in Qorvo’s Supply Chain as of April 22, 2022

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Table 3: Potential Countries of Origin for SORs Identified for the Reporting Period

Countries from which the 3TG used in Qorvo’s products may have originated based on the RMI’s RCOI report dated March 25, 2022.

15

16

INDEPENDENT PRIVATE SECTOR AUDIT

Qorvo engaged RCS Global Ltd to conduct an independent private sector audit of this CMR for the Reporting Period. Refer to the audit report attached as Exhibit A to this CMR.

2022 PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS

Qorvo is committed to the responsible sourcing of 3TG and will continue to advance the implementation of its responsible mineral program with relevant suppliers.

For the 2022 reporting period, we plan to:

Forward Looking Statements

This Conflict Minerals Report contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our due diligence planned improvements, and other statements preceded by terminology such as “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “goal,” “hope,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “reasonably,” “should,” “thinks,” “will” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, and include, among others, our planned improvements. These statements are only predictions or our current intentions. We do not guarantee future activities, performance or achievements, which could be affected by, among other things, changes in Rule 13p-1, interpretations of Rule 13p-1, international due diligence frameworks, law, our internal allocation of resources or emphasis, customer demands or expectations, and the cooperation of suppliers. We do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Conflict Minerals Report. These forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provision of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

17

Exhibit A

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

INDEPENDENT PRIVATE SECTOR AUDIT REPORT

DODD FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, SECTION 1502

Qorvo, Inc.

To the Board of Directors

RCS Global Ltd (or “RCS”) conducted an Independent Private Sector Audit (IPSA) of Qorvo, Inc. (“the Company”) Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period of January 1 to December 31, 2021. We examined evidence relating to the audit objectives set forth in 17 CFR Part 249b.400, Section 1, Item 1.01, which state that the auditor is to express an opinion or conclusion as to:

1) Whether the design of the Company’s due diligence measures as set forth in the Company’s Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2021, is in conformity with, in all material respects, the criteria set forth in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, Third Edition 2016 (“OECD Guidance”), and

2) Whether the Company’s description of the due diligence measures it performed, as set forth in the Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2021, is consistent with the due diligence process that the Company undertook.

Management is responsible for the design of the Company’s due diligence framework and the description of the Company’s due diligence measures set forth in the Conflict Minerals Report, and performance of the due diligence measures. The opinion or conclusion in this audit report is in relation to the two audit objectives. These audit objectives are narrowly defined and do not include the auditor’s opinion on:

18

Consequently, we do not express an opinion or conclusion on the matters listed above or any other matters included in any section of the Conflict Minerals Report other than the design of the Company’s due diligence framework and the Company’s description of the due diligence measures it performed as set forth in the audit objectives.

We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards, in particular Chapters 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 of the U.S. Government Accountability Office Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards, Revision of December 2011. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.

For the first audit objective, we reviewed policies, processes and procedures describing the design of the due diligence framework and conducted interviews with the persons directly responsible for the conflict minerals program and the design of the due diligence framework at the Company. For the second audit objective, we reviewed records supporting the implementation of due diligence measures as described in the Conflict Minerals Report and conducted interviews with the persons of the Company involved in the implementation of these measures. For the second audit objective, we adopted a sampling approach for the review of records, taking into account the type of mineral, the total population as well as type and level of risk associated with sourcing practices of supply chain actors.

We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings based on our audit objectives.

Management was provided an opportunity to review and offer comments on a draft of this report and had no comments to the draft report.

In our opinion,

RCS Global Ltd

London, 06 April 2022

Josue Ruiz

Auditor

19